Shrug accomplit! For all the worries, I think this is perfectly wearable for my cousin’s wedding. First of all it slides on easily. No worming to get into it. I’m many things but decidedly not a victim to fashion. This shrug is also a perfect twin for the dress. The yarn’s silky sheen is my favourite but the dye striping also matches the material’s subtle stripes. Hubby’s Oohs & Aahs? Priceless! I’ll post pictures from the wedding but here’s a pre-coffee FO pic in the meantime:
Not showing you my smug grin…
I decided against going for an edging. Overly girly accessorizing ain’t my thang. Since it grew in the blocking, there’s some sag at the armhole joins. It may be a little distracting but I am thinking it’s comfortable to move around in.
Now this is completed, I’ve also returned to the Straight-Up Socks (remember? blue denim superwashies). No 2nd sock syndrome here. I am also leaning towards finishing the pink baby cardi – come what may of it. My other girlfriend will get a yummy lime creation for her bambino/a.
We live in interesting times. This 2nd sock came along a ways as Canada’s fromer Prime Minister, Brian Mulroney took the stand, yesterday. I was a teenager in Jamaica when Mr. Mulroney was in office. The Inquiry is back live on CBC television, and I am watching. He seems to have aged rapidly between the Ethics committee hearings in November 2007 and now. The public scandal is obviously taking its toll. He held himself proudly but the bags under his eyes made him look alarmingly like his nemesis, Karlheinz Schreiber.
At its heart the scandal is whether Mr. Mulroney took that first wad of 75 $1,000 bills, and the rest of it as a kick-back. Led by his lawyer, Guy J. Pratte, Mr. Mulroney spoke to and around the allegations of suspicion in his own lawyerese. As he testified, the veil fell from the processes by which major policy decisions were made in his executive government. I was fascinated to hear how he controled the personel of the central government, and the chanels of communication. To be on my couch hearing the authority that kept Bearhead alive, how and why. This is the stuff of L1 Constitutional Law.
The negative space of his testimony was even more telling. As one example – Why was he Memoed on Bearhead at all? He was a national leader, “tenacious of office” to use the language of Stanley de Smith & Rodney Brazier in my old “Constitutional & Administrative Law” text. He tells the Inquiry that his public reputation would have been boosted by creating jobs in a province with up to 50% unemployment. Bearhead’s light armoured vehicles were undoubtedly his pet project. He exercised muscle, and the decision was in his hands outside the Cabinet. He spoke of reassuring his Cabinet on the principles that were guiding the decision. It is not every day that the inner workings of a Parlimentary democracy are laid bare.
There is much ‘material’ for Mr. Mulroney’s cross-examination. His chief was depressingly thread-bare in all of the important places. Was I dreaming when I heard of a single meeting that moved from Schriber’s threat of a law suit to a fat envelope passing hands? There were other days when the money passed and was accepted. As what? From what source? Never asked; was never told. Mr. Schriber dances there too. Then we hear of photos with “UN insignia” that Mr. Mulroney insists speak for themselves. Lastly there’s the paltry excuse to keep it all hidden. As the saying goes – we are as sick as our secrets.
As if that were not enough, we also have the spectacle of Ruby Dhalla in Nanny-Gate. Her white suit was blinding. Her statements were wooden, and delivered in such an imperious tone. It came together to enhance the caregivers’ allegations that she and her family were overbearing, autocratic employers. I cringed to hear her intone over & again, “I, Ruby Dhalla…” Misguided in the extreme.